I'm no bible scholar either but here are some things that I have found interesting over the years.
In an effort to support the validity of the bible, the WT claims that nothing in the bible has been changed, altered or omitted in any significant way over the centuries of translating. However, they take it upon themselves to insert Gods name in the new testament over 250 times, completely ignoring the fact it has never been found in any fragment or copy.
The oldest copies of the NT in existence are written 100 years after Jesus died. They are not complete books, only scraps of parts of scriptures.
The first complete books of the NT are dated to the 3rd century, not the complete bible- only some books.
The first complete NT bible, the codex sinaiticus doesnt appear until the 4th century.
None of the gospels were eyewitness accounts and the originals werent written until decades after the death of Jesus.
Luke and Paul never met Jesus, yet between them are responsible for writing about half of the books of the NT.
God did not dictate the canon of the bible- it was decided upon by men.
Many books that we have in the NT werent universally accepted as belonging in the bible and some still arent by certain branches of christian faiths.
The version of the bible used by JW's is the protestant bible which didnt exist before 1534 CE, which separated the apocrypha. If JW's believe God inspired the books of the bible and it was already complete in the 1st century, then why accept a revised version over 1000 years later which removes some books?